gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon


From: RJack
Subject: Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:15:01 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/17/2010 11:36 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
"We do not believe that the Copyright Act permits holders of rights
under copyrights to choose third parties to bring suits on their behalf.

<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>



SOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY, INC and ERIK ANDERSEN, Plaintiffs -against- BEST BUY CO.,INC.,...

Erik Andersen, an owner of copyright in BusyBox, is suing for copyright infringement.

The point is not that Erik Andersen is a named plaintiff. Back on
12/15/09 I made the point that the SFLC's attorneys are utterly
incompetent when it comes to filing a copyright infringement suit in
federal court. The SFLC attorneys filed seven consecutive frivolous
infringement suits for Erik Andersen over BusyBox code when Andersen had
not filed *anything* -- nada, null, nil -- with the Copyright Office.
Filing seven consecutive suits without standing is frivolous and stupid.

The SFLC next filed a lawsuit against fourteen defendants, having joined
a plaintiff (SOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY, INC.) that clearly has no
copyrights registered and has no standing in the lawsuit. Joining a
plaintiff when it is glaringly obvious that he is without standing is
frivolous and stupid.

Not wanting to discuss the unpleasant topic of legal incompetency
reigning at the SFLC, you quickly change the topic of discussion.

How would the SFLC ever proceed with their burden of proof in a
lawsuit? The SFLC director Eben Moglen, while touting his title of
'Professor of Law' at Columbia University announced to the World that
"Licenses are not contracts:...", See:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html
despite the fact that no federal court in the past eighty years has
ever found a copyright license to be anything other than a contract.
The SFLC is run by a socialist crackpot who happily pimps gullible Free
Softies and collects a six figure salary from public donations.

If the SFLC is incompetent what does that make Free Softies?

You can can bet there's a $tory behind the birth of the $OFTWARE FREEDOM
CONSERVANCY, INC. There are certainly enough gullible Free $ofties out
there to fleece! No one has ever lost a dime betting on the ignorance of
the American public.

"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack :)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]