Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alan Mackenzie]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:

> I don't understand your desire to infect separate and independeant
> works via static linking and at the same time your desire to not
> penetrate the infection through the dynamic linking.

"To penetrate the infection" ????  What the heck is that supposed to mean?

> Perhaps you should simply stop being intellectually dishonest?

Maybe using standard English, as best you can manage, might help convey
your meaning.

> regards,
> alexander.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).