Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/3/2010 4:34 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Shut up or sue me
> 
> I will do neither.

Why am I not surprised?

> 
> > I don't understand your desire...
> 
> Desire is irrelevant. Fact is relevant. I am pointing
> out the facts of the situation. It is your desire to

You are pointing nothing relevant and ignoring the facts:

Facts such as 

http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html

"LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED PRODUCT WARRANTY RED HAT® ENTERPRISE
LINUX® AND RED HAT® APPLICATIONS

This agreement governs the use of the Software and any updates to the
Software, regardless of the delivery mechanism. The Software is a
collective work under U.S. Copyright Law. "

note that Red Hat's collective work contains tons of non-GPL components
even "incompatible" with the GPL.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)