Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again

[David Kastrup]

RJack <user@example.net> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Most certainly the SFLC does not need to read the outpour of
>> self-proclaimed legal amateurs in this newsgroup in order to plan their
>> course of action.
>>
>> They have a quite better track record at predicting legal cases than the
>> most vociferous know-alls here.
>>
>
> Do you mean the eight frivolous suits the SFLC filed concerning BusyBox
> prior to Erik Andersen attempting to steal the other contributing
> developers' code contributions by fraudulently registering the BusyBox
> program ?
>
> The SFLC has a perfect track record. Every case they filed concerning
> Monsoon and BusyBox they dismissed before a judge could ever read one
> of their idiotic complaints.

With the defendant coming into compliance and the source code being made
available.  Since the defendants have been big corporations with big
lawyer teams partly, that tells something.  Namely that the big
corporation lawyers agree with the SFLC's legal assessment, in contrast
to you.  Which you don't want to hear...

-- 
David Kastrup