[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?"
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?" |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:30:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/15/black_duck_gpl_web_conference_copenhaver_radcliffe/
>
> "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?
>
> Open source legal minds unravel license
>
> By Austin Modine in San Francisco • Get more from this author
>
> Posted in Software, 15th October 2009 06:02 GMT
>
> Two prominent IP lawyers have warned that the all-pervasive General
> Public License version 2 (GPLv2) contains legally ambiguous wording that
> may be problematic for licensees.
Impossible.
Peter Koehlmann told us here in COLA that is was "easy" and only
"windiots" could not understand it. He is, of course, quite insane.
- [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?",
Hadron <=
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Moshe Goldfarb, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Moshe Goldfarb, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Hadron, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", JEDIDIAH, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Rjack, 2009/10/17
- Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/17