Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > > Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > > lawfully made tangible copy
> > > The copies made for personal use, under the GPL's ...
> > *Run* to doctor, Hyman.
>
> As an illustrative example, imagine that you videotape an 
> over-the-air broadcast television program. Do you believe that 
> first-sale allows you to sell the videotape? Do you further believe
>  that you may set up a battery of VCRs to record the show multiple
>  times and sell those tapes?

How does an "over-the-air broadcast television program" relate
to an "over-the-internet computer program" licensed under a FOSS license?

Before your silly "over-the-air broadcast television program"
rhetorical question even makes sense, you must stipulate what
license, if any, is applicable to the hypothetical
"over-the-air broadcast television program".

Sincerely,
Rjack