[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:30:53 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Is that a loophole for the GPL in US jurisdiction? Maybe, but
> apparently not large enough to be attractive for setting up a business.
Dak, dak, dak, how do you know that? Please share with us the
methodology of your study regarding "not large enough to be attractive
for setting up a business", stupid dak.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Nigel Feltham, 2009/10/11
- http://www.citizen.org/join/, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Robert Heller, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Robert Heller, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11