[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:10:59 +0200 |
Robert Heller wrote:
[...]
> If one has, for example, a shrink wrapped copy, never opened (and thus
> never installed), it is perfectly legal to re-sell that copy. I
> believe that was citizen.org's case. Once you install it (eg open the
Stop here, Heeler.
Don't you own a legitimate "GPL'd" copy (after making a copy of the
copy pursuant to the GPL) just like in the former case, Heeler?
WHO OWNS ALL THE COPIES YOU'VE MADE THANKS TO THE GPL, HEELER?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Nigel Feltham, 2009/10/11
- http://www.citizen.org/join/, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Robert Heller, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Robert Heller, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/12