Re: Groklaw attacks Alexander -- Again

[Alan Mackenzie]

In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:

>> Have you posted, or tried to post, on Groklaw, RJack?

> Why not ask your buddy PJ? She fanatically records and attempts to
> analyze all network quads that communicate with the Groklaw site.

Is that right?  ;-)

> I do occasionally communicate with interactive blog sites using both a
> double blind commercial anonymizer and and old dial-up site that has
> random dhcp assignment.

Do you really?

> It is quite entertaining to watch people endlessly speculate about the
> identity of a poster while they are quite obviously incapable of
> formulating a cogent response to the posted message.

The identity of the poster is an essential part of the message.

> If you have no information concerning the author of a message then you
> have to criticize the content of the message and not the messenger,
> which is the way it should be on a network with over one billion
> participants.

Rjack, I can't say I'm that interested in what you post on Groklaw.  It's
the notion of you posting there at all that tickles me.

> Sincerely,
> Rjack

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).