Re: GPL traitor !

[Doctor Smith]

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:19:04 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> DumbFullShit blubbered:
>>
>>> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> In gnu.misc.discuss Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@ols.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:45:12 +0000 (UTC), Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It seems Matt has long misunderstood the GPL.
>>>>
>>>>> Like 99 percent of people who through some unfortunate process come
>>>>> in contact with it.
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't know, since I don't know any such people.  I know lots of
>>>> people whose contact with the GPL is benign, rewarding and
>>>> profitable.
>>>
>>> GPL and profitable in the same sentence?  You funny guy!
>>
>> Most software is written and used "in-house", not for some "markt".
> 
> It's very specious of you to sarcastically refer to "market" with quotes, 
> seeing as you make a living developing Windows programs for sale (or in 
> support of) a market.
> 
> 
> 
>> Perfectly fine for GPL, as the software is not intended to be
>> distributed outside of those companies.
> 
> What does this mean?  Where's your evidence corporations are developing GPL 
> code internally?  You have none - you're a cola idiot.
> 
> 
> 
>> You as the drooling VB-"coder" would know nothing about that,
>> naturally.
> 
> You sound mad that you're trapped in a Windows development career.  Not 
> enough Linux jobs?  But various cola liars claim Linux is on half the 
> desktops in Europe, so there should be a job for a dumbkopf like you.


I have a sneaking suspecian that Peter Kohlmann is involved in the abortion
known as "The Munich Linux Migration".

That would explain why he is so bitter.
How much worse of a Linux failure can you find?

Maybe some of Terry Porter's projects, but that's really about it.