[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:17:31 -0700 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <gqv0p4$tjt$1@blue.rahul.net>,
c.c.eiftj@XReXXMicro.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote:
>
> Where you get your statistics about typical settlements? How do you
> define a typical settlement?
Observation of settlement reports in the press. Reading the settlement
reports filed with the court in interesting cases.
If you don't like "typical", I'll change my claim: it's not unusual for
neither party to publicly talk about the settlement amount.
>
> Even if you could define what typical settlement means, how do you
> conclude that this was a typical settlement without knowing the details?
I drew no such conclusion. The only conclusion drawing has been from
you--you've concluded that because you don't know the details, it must
have been a tiny settlement.
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Phil Da Lick!, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/01
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Tim Smith, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/01