|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:09:50 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:04:54 -0400, Rjack wrote:Thufir Hawat wrote:On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote:All EULA would be contracts, yes? Not complying with an EULA opens up a can of worms.Depends on whether the EULA is ultimately found by the courts to be enforceable or not.Do please generalize as to whether other EULA are, or are not, contracts in your view.All EULAs are contracts.So, when an EULA is ignored, the usual response is copyright infringement, right?
If the EULA is legally enforceable it could constitute breach of contract or copyright infringement (or both) depending on the terms of the particular EULA under consideration.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |