|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:43:34 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:26:59 -0400, Rjack wrote:In the current suit Free Software Foundation Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc. the FSF is asking for monetary damages:which is commercial, so the comparison fails there.
Read the Grokfud link:[ Update: Ray Beckerman sends a correction. He says the reasoning of the four cases and two law review articles and the brief is equally applicable to commercial copyright infringement defendants.]" http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090321164736122Sincerely, Rjack
" So it's more support for the concept of proportionality and asking the court to consider the Constitutionality of statutory damages in copyright cases involving noncommercial individuals."-from the above link.*cases involving noncommercial individuals*. Is cisco such an individual?
"[ Update: Ray Beckerman sends a correction. He says the reasoning of the four cases and two law review articles and the brief is equally applicable to commercial copyright infringement defendants.]" http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090321164736122 Hmmm. . . I see, ". . . equally applicable to commercial copyright infringement defendants." Why not write PJ and ask her to remove the "Update:" from her article since you wish to ignore it?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |