[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
AZ Nomad |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:02:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) |
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:25:13 +0100, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>>
>> >If IBM acquires SUN you can be assured that open sourced version of Java
>> >will end up as either eclipse or apache project with its license changed
>> >away from the GPL pretty soon.
>>
>> It would be forked.
>By whom? Anyway, the fork won't be called Java and won't have a chance
>to keep pace with IBM/SUN controlled open sourced Java project.
>>
>> >Buh-bye GPL'd Java.
>>
>> Idiot.
>I know that you are not quite smart, chrissy.
Do you have any idea how idiotic you sound when you parade the four
year old's "no I'm not you are" argument?
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, chrisv, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, chrisv, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, chrisv, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
AZ Nomad <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/21
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/21
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/21
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Thufir, 2009/03/22