[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:50:53 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
> "Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
> news:0fCpl.43919$cI2.32936@newsfe09.iad...
>> amicus_curious wrote:
>>> You ignore the rather obvious fact that Verizon is distributing binary
>>> code for the routers from its own website to anyone and everyone who
>>> wants it without regard to the requirements of the GPL that this
>>> binary code be accompanied by the source that created it.
>>
>> Whether Verizon is incurring a GPL obligation depends on the fine
>> details of what it is doing, and who is considered to be doing the
>> copying when a person clicks on a URL in order to obtain software.
>> Since the URL contains the string "actiontec gateway" it's plausible
>> that the Verizon webserver contacts an Actiontec gateway in order to
>> get the software to the clicker.
>>
> Not plausible at all. I am sure that Verizon obtained their copy of the
> binary files from Actiontec, but they are plainly sourced from the
> Verizon site.
Does the binary file which is being distributed reside on the verizon
server? If so, then Verizon would be required to make the source
available upon request from a customer. If the binary isn't on a Verizon
server then Verizon has no obligations is the argument.
The fact that there's a link on verizon.com which causes this binary to
download doesn't prove that the binary file is on a Verizon server.
-Thufir
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/28
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/28
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/28
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/28
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/28
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/26
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/28