Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Peter Köhlmann]

amicus_curious wrote:

> 
> "David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
> 85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
>> "amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
>>
>>> "Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Gpjol.24760$uG1.4427@newsfe16.iad...
>>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:24 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But the BusyBox authors are totally willing to give their work away
>>>>> and
>>>>> have been doing so for years.  The only thing that they are
>>>>> hammering their users in regard to is for not publishing the
>>>>> acknowledgement and code itself on the user's own site.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Exactly, if you choose to distribute *their* work then there are
>>>> conditions.  What's wrong with that?
>>>
>>> The conditions are silly and useless, making the authors appear to be
>>> the same.
>>
>> So what?  You don't seem to have much of a problem with being silly and
>> useless, certainly being much more so than the BusyBox authors.
>>
> But I am not suing companies for such trivia. 

And yet you are the one gloating about how MS would tear anyone to shreds 
doing similar things with MS software

> And you can only muster some
> inane slurs in response?  

He was extremely polite, given your extreme dishonesty

> That is pretty lame.

The one pretty lame would be you, Bill Weisgerber, with your lame attempts 
at making GPL an non-issue
-- 
Warning: You have moved the mouse. 
Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent