Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Peter Köhlmann]

Rjack wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> 
>> That is something else entirely. You neglected that little tidbit
>> that they distributed GPLed binaries. By not distributing the
>> source, they were breaching the sole licence which allowed them
>> to distribute the binaries in the first place
>> 
>> And *that* is every little bit grounds to sue them
> 
> And *that* is 100% bullshit. You can't just make up your own
> copyright contract containing legal gibberish and then claim
> it gives you legal grounds to sue someone.
> 

Idiot
-- 
The Day Microsoft makes something that does not suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.