[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:59:14 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:05:35 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
> Verizon openly distributes the Ationtec product. That makes them a
> distributor and does not make Actiontec a Verizon agent. Even though
> Verizon is openly distributing a product that contains GPL licensed
> software, they do not provide the source. One has to go to some
> upstream locatoion in order to obtain source.
You're begging the question and haven't established that Verizon is a
distributor *in the sense which applies here*.
The critical point is that the OEM is Actiontec. How does Verizon obtain
the routers? Actiontec distributes the routers to Verizon. It seems
debatable that Verizon is even a distributor in this sense as Verizon
didn't install Linux onto the router.
I think that the key distinction is *who* put Linux on the router, and
that whoever did is the distributor. Some third party who sells a device
with GPL software installed on it isn't necessarily distributing that
software.
-Thufir
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/19
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/20