Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Alexander Terekhov]

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> 
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
> 
> >As the United States Supreme Court unequivocally stated, ..."It goes
> >without saying that a contract cannot bind a nonparty."....
> 
> Can a person a non-party lawfully distribute GPL software?

Sure. 17 USC 109.

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)