[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:54:51 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) (Rahul Dhesi) writes:

> Rjack writes:
>>Aren't you a being a little presumptuous when you simply ignore the
>>doctrine of promissory estoppel when considering a failed license?
> What's the promise here?

He thought he could get away with ignoring the license.  Of course, only
a lunatic would claim that this delusion was a "promise" planned for by
the licensor.  But it is less expensive to make a fool of oneself and
get laughed at in Usenet than in court.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]