[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:57:39 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> "For non-commercial use, Artifex licences Ghostscript to the public
>> free of charge under the GNU GPL."
>
> This is not an actual explanatory paragraph. Again, if you
> wish to make coherent, cogent posts,
You want to base an argument on that premise?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/29
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/30
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/26
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Cork Soaker, 2008/11/28