|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
Date: | Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:17:19 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Ha ha! If only the court really had jurisdiction... ------ 09/11/2008 6 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Erik Andersen and Rob Landley against Bell Microproducts, Inc., D.B.A. Hammer Storage. Ordered that this matter be referred to a Magistrate Judge for an inquest. (Signed byJudge Harold Baer on 9/10/08) (ml) (Entered: 09/11/2008) ------http://www.terekhov.de/DEFAULT-JUDGMENT.pdf ------ ... all products, including the MyShare HN1200, embodying or incorporating the aforesaid copyrights of the Plaintiffs, in the possession, custody, or control of Defendant, be delivered up to the Plaintiffs for destruction within thirty (30) days after service on Defendant of this Judgment. ------LOL.regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.)
Let us first review the Bell Micro case at: http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/jun/10/busybox/bell-complaint.pdf Next review the law of the Second Circuit: "It [The Copyright Act] provides that "no action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title." . . . Whether this requirement is jurisdictional is not up for debate in this Circuit. On two recent occasions, we have squarely held that it is"; In re Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation 509 F.3d 116 (United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit 2007). It should be explained to legally challenged GPL worshipers what the effect of the default judgment will be: 1) Lot's of hi-powered spin from the SFLC. The GPL won again!! The GPL won in court!! 2) Lot's of embarrassment and a red face for the federal magistrate when the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit kicks his ass for entering a default judgment in a case that he clearly had no subject matter jurisdiction to hear. 3) An award of costs and attorney fees to defendant Bell Micro Inc. As the United States Supreme Court stated: "[T]he first and fundamental question is that of jurisdiction, first, of this court, and then of the court from which the record comes. This question the court is bound to ask and answer for itself, even when not otherwise suggested, and without respect to the relation of the parties to it. The requirement that jurisdiction be established as a threshold matter spring[s] from the nature and limits of the judicial power of the United States and is inflexible and without exception." (citations and quotations omitted) Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 U. S. 83 (1998)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |