[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The GPL dream is finally over!
From: |
Andrew Halliwell |
Subject: |
Re: The GPL dream is finally over! |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:18:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.24-20-generic (i686)) |
Rjack <me@there.com> wrote:
> Context eh?
>
> I posted a link to the complete decision and you replied to my post, so
> you would have access to the court's decision.
What did that decision have to do with the GPL?
It was a completely different license. All that was required in that license
was attribution (which they had failed to comply with)
If it's the decision I'm thinking of anyway.
--
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, (continued)
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Linonut, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Linonut, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Linonut, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Snit, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Linonut, 2008/08/17
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!,
Andrew Halliwell <=
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Andrew Halliwell, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Andrew Halliwell, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rjack, 2008/08/16
- Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/16
Re: The GPL dream is finally over!, Rex Ballard, 2008/08/16