[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:16:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
I don't need standing, ueber GNUtian ams. I'm not on demanding side
("you must ... You must ... you must ... you must ... You must ... you
must ... you must ..." <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>), you
idiot.
No one gets to copy and distribute other people's copyrighted
works without permission. It seems to me that you are the one
demanding that the license that does allow redistribution in
limited ways be voided such that the copyright owner's works
may be stolen from him. Why would any court agree to that?
> Hint: plaintiff needs to prove standing, not defendant.
No one needs standing to post on Usenet. Usenet is not a court.
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Message not available
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16