[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recommend a license, please
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Recommend a license, please |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:18:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
[Somewhat rearranged]
Ivan Fomichev <ifomichev@gmail.com> writes:
> On 14 апр, 14:29, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > readable ;-), b)weak copyleft,
>> What does "weak" mean for you? Your example is pretty much like "GPL"
>> which is not generally considered "weak".
> For me, "weak copyleft" means
> 1. non-greedy, that is the license must allow any software to get
> profit of licensed software
The GPL is not prohibiting profit.
> GPL is the worst choice, even besides its illegibility. It is greedy,
I don't understand a single word of what you are trying to state. I am
not even sure that you have a clear picture of it yourself.
> 2. free of hubris, that is the license must not require any software,
> that gets profit of licensed software, to use the same license
[continued sentence about GPL:]
> and who dares speak about self-esteem being full of hubris?
Again, I don't understand a single word of what you are trying to say.
>
>> > c) enforceable
>> What is it that you want to enforce when you are talking about "weak"?
> 3. Self-esteemed, that is the license must require any modified
> versions of software to be also open source
But that is pretty much what the GPL enforces.
>> > and d) GPL-compatible.
Sigh.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Recommend a license, please, Ivan Fomichev, 2008/04/15
- Re: Recommend a license, please, David Kastrup, 2008/04/14
- Re: Recommend a license, please, Ivan Fomichev, 2008/04/15
- Re: Recommend a license, please,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Recommend a license, please, Ivan Fomichev, 2008/04/15
- Re: Recommend a license, please, David Kastrup, 2008/04/14
- Re: Recommend a license, please, Ivan Fomichev, 2008/04/15
- Re: Recommend a license, please, Ivan Fomichev, 2008/04/15