[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "News" Verizon calls SFLC bluff

From: rjack
Subject: Re: "News" Verizon calls SFLC bluff
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:51:25 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080213)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

" . . . Again, though, since the boxes involved are Actiontec's, they
chose to take responsibility for remedying both their own and Verizon's
past violations and ensuring compliance in the future."

Since the dismissal was with PREJUDICE future litigation is forever foreclosed.

This is my favorite part of the spin, "... ensuring compliance in the future."

In the future Verizon and Actiontec can distribute the BusyBox code any way they wish since plaintiffs Andersen and Landley can't do a damn thing about it. . . BECAUSE THEY LOST THEIR CASE . . .

"A voluntary dismissal with prejudice operates as a final adjudication on the merits and has a res judicata effect." Harrison v. Edison Bros. Apparel Stores, Inc., 924 F.2d 530, 534 (4th Cir. 1991).



--- "Standing doctrine embraces several judicially self-imposed limits on the exercise of federal jurisdiction, such as the general prohibition on a litigant's raising another person's legal rights, . . ."; ALLEN v. WRIGHT 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984) ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]