[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:38:10 +0100 |
Ha!
rjack wrote:
>
> Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> > Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> The problem with the GNU GPL is that it is so confusing that the people
> >> making decisions are leery of using Open Source code because they can't
> >> determine positively what the impact, if any, could be to their
> >> business.
> >
> >> Some of this is due to confusion and misunderstanding of the GPL, but
> >> that's really the point.
> >
> > After they get caught violating the license they often plead
> > misunderstanding and confusion. :-)
>
> After "they" (think Verizon) get "caught" they tell the SFLC (Software
> Fictional Licensing Center) to kiss their royal ass and SFLC quickly
> volunteers to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice and then claims
Both the official docket and
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/VOLUNTARY_DISMISSAL.pdf itself say
that the SFLC volunteered to dismiss the lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE.
*WITH PREJUDICE*
Fascinating!
SFLC ran scared to death out of court conceding total defeat!!!
--
http://linuxtaliban.com/bilder.htm
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, (continued)
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, rjack, 2008/03/06
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/03/17
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, rjack, 2008/03/17
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/03/17
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/03/17
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/03/17
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, rjack, 2008/03/17