[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:22:03 +0100 wrote:
> On Dec 28, 7:46 am, Alexander Terekhov <> wrote:
> > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > That's the other reason I asked if there were lawyers that specialize
> > > in this sort of thing...
> >
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > alexander.
> Thanks Alexander, I'm giving this a read now.

Next, you might want to visit the following links
(Moot Court Statements of Fact)
(Omega Plaintiff's Brief)
(Alpha Defendant's Brief)
(Hearing and Q&A)

The Scope of "Derivative Works" as Applied to Software: David Bender of White
& Case LLP and author of Computer Law and Ieuan Mahony of Holland & Knight
LLP will argue the proper scope of "derivative work" under U.S. copyright law
when applied to software, before a panel of distinguished federal appellate

* HONORABLE WILLIAM C. BRYSON, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
* HONORABLE HALDANE ROBERT MAYER, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
* HONORABLE MARGARET MCKEOWN, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

BTW, there were a whole bunch of remarkable remarks from judges.

Like "what is a license if not a contract", "the real word issue" of
preemption, "intent" is not really helpful, etc. etc.


(Give all that stuff to your lawyer.)


"PlaintiffsÂ’ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess"

                             -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]