[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:43:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Noah Slater" <nslater@bytesexual.org> writes:
> On 05/12/2007, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I do not understand why *names* are the
>>appropriate place to give credit. What's the reason, anyway?
>
> For the same reason [...]
I think it is enough to feed the trolls with a reference. In particular
since it is easy to mess up:
> Of course, the proper name for the operating system is GNU and Linux
> provides one of it's kernels. The combination of these two words is
> GNU/Linux. If you used Sun's kernel you would call the system
> GNU/Solarix and if you used the BSD operating system (as an
> alternative to GNU) you would be running BSD/Solarix.
There is no such system as "Solarix", and Sun calls the _complete_
system "Solaris" with a "SunOS" kernel.
So you would actually be talking about GNU/SunOS in that hypothetical
case (and that only when indeed the kernel is all that you have taken
from Solaris). Where you have a GNU userland, but augmented with all of
the system utilities from Solaris (not an entirely unpopular setup),
things become quite muddier.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, rjack, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Re: Troll naming, Andy Baxter, 2007/12/11
- Re: Troll naming, rjack, 2007/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/05