[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:14:29 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
rjack wrote:
> The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously "all third
> parties". Clearly the plaintiffs are "parties" to the GPL contract and
> cannot be a member of the class "all third parties." Therefore the
> plaintiffs can suffer no injury by the source code not being made
> available to "all third parties".
The "third parties" here are all who are neither the donor nor the donee.
And under US law it is not necessary for a copyright owner to show actual
injury.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, David Kastrup, 2007/11/24
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, Arnoud Engelfriet, 2007/11/24
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, David Kastrup, 2007/11/24
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/11/24
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, Arnoud Engelfriet, 2007/11/24
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, David Kastrup, 2007/11/24
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit,
John Hasler <=