[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:48:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
rjack wrote:
> If the suit goes forward (which I seriously doubt) the District Court
> will dismiss due to failure to state a federal claim. Contract claims are
> heard under the common law of state jurisdictions.
Odd, then, that the defendants paid money to the plaintiffs and agreed to
abide by all terms of the GPL in order to avoid going to trial, isn't it?
Seems like this happens over and over again. I wonder why...
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, Geza Giedke, 2007/10/30
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, Richard Tobin, 2007/10/31
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, rjack, 2007/10/31
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, Richard Tobin, 2007/10/31
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, rjack, 2007/10/31
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, Geza Giedke, 2007/10/31
- Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum, Richard Tobin, 2007/10/31