[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:44:16 +0200 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:44:05PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:29:40PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > > ROFL. Hey dak, you know that your theory of user linking (when
> > > > there is no "library with compatible interface") creating "acting as
> > > > your agent" liability is utter nonsense and only totally lobotomized
> > > > GNUtians take it seriously, don't you? Just curious.
> > >
> > > Hey Alex,
> > >
> > > Why don't you get a Shared Source license and test your theories and
> > > then mail Stevie Balmer?
> >
> > What exactly do you want me to test and then mail Stevie Balmer,
> > dear mini-RMS?
>
> Your theories. Go sell copies of Windows that you make.
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensing/windows.mspx
Quick inspection revealed that Windows shared source licenses do not
grant rights of reproduction and/or adaptation of Windows (apart from
17 USC 117 defaults, that is).
You can't compare it to GPL (or Ms-PL/RL for this matter) with its
broad scope of granted rights (all rights are granted).
Now please mail this message to Stevie Balmer yourself, mini-RMS.
regards,
alexander.
--
"The revolution might take significantly longer than anticipated."
-- The GNU Monk Harald Welte
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, danw6144, 2007/10/25