[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL question

From: rjack
Subject: Re: GPL question
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:10:24 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20070728)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
John Hasler <> writes:
Rjack is a troll.  There is no point in trying to make sense of what he
FWIW, Mike Cox is a troll too, though perhaps a slightly more subtle one
than bumblers like rjack or wigged out nutcases like Terekhov.

Greetings to Mike Cox. Troll brigade growing!!! Oh poor GNUtians.


"The revolution might take significantly longer than anticipated."

                                     -- The GNU Monk Harald Welte

When replying to a legal argument or belief supported by reference to applicable legal principle or citation to case precedent, attacking the character of the person advancing the argument i.e. calling them a "troll" renders the reply irrelevant.

You must base your reply upon citation to appropriate legal principle or case law that refutes the original sources. Attempting to refute rational argument utilizing ad hominen attack implies no reasonable reply is available.

People participating in this forum are obviously capable of checking cited legal authorities for themselves. Denigrating the character of someone citing to a legal resource does nothing to disprove the content of the resource. Appealing to base emotional reaction instead of urging rational thought should be left to political campaign managers


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]