[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?
|
From: |
Tim Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:27:09 -0000 |
|
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2007-07-27, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>> It's still managed by people from Sun, and they contribute most of the
>> code.
>
> More to the point:
>
> http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html
Yup. It's interesting how many self-proclaimed open source advocates
don't seem to actually know anything about what they advocate, other
than that it isn't Microsoft and it isn't Apple.
- Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, plenty560, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, anon, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Jeremy Fisher, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, spike1, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Roy Schestowitz, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, graeme, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Hadron, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/28