[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "Face it, the 'open source' crowd i
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "Face it, the 'open source' crowd is the *bigger* crowd" |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:17:01 +0200 |
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > > "More Developers" (either "Free Software" or "Open Source") == "More
> > > Contributions"
> >
> > No, seriously. Linus is disputing the equation above, dismissing my
> > various attempts to show it to him, whenever it appears in teh context
> > of tivoization, apparently because it doesn't match his moral belief
> > that tivoization ought to be permitted on his moral grounds.
>
> No. Linus is not AT ALL disputing the equation above.
>
> But you are too f*cking stupid to admit that I *accepted* the
>
> - "More developers" == "More contributions" == good
>
> equation, but I was claiming that your *other* part was totally broken.
>
> You try to claim that the GPLv3 causes "More developers", and that, my
> idiotic penpal, is just crazy talk that you made up.
>
> But since you cannot follow a logical argument, and cannot make one up
> on your own, you instead make up some *other* argument, and try (like
> above) to try to say that I made that claim.
>
> The GPLv2 is the one that allows more developers.
>
> The GPLv2 is the one that is acceptable to more people.
>
> Face it, the "open source" crowd is the *bigger* crowd. The FSF crowd is
> vocal and opinionated, but it's largely made up of people who _talk_ more
> than they actually _code_.
>
> Hot air doesn't make the world go round. Real code does.
>
> Look at the kernel developers who claim that the GPLv2 is better. Not just
> me. Then look at the people who actually GET THINGS DONE.
>
> There's a big overlap there.
>
> Now, look at the people who try to sell the GPLv3 as the best thing since
> sliced bread. How many of those are people who actually get things *done*?
>
> I haven't really seen a single one. Last I did the statistic, I asked the
> top ~25-30 kernel developers about their opinion. NOT A SINGLE ONE
> preferred the GPLv3.
>
> So I have actual *numbers* on my side. What do you have, except for a
> history of not actually understanding my arguments?
>
> Linus
> -
regards,
alexander.
--
"Live cheaply," he said, offering some free advice. "Don't buy a house,
a car or have children. The problem is they're expensive and you have
to spend all your time making money to pay for them."
-- Free Software Foundation's Richard Stallman: 'Live Cheaply'
- dot Communist Eben meets Indian Marxist-Leninist (his life after GPLv3 so to speak :-) ), (continued)
- dot Communist Eben meets Indian Marxist-Leninist (his life after GPLv3 so to speak :-) ), Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "GPLv2 does not state that you have to become a slave of rms", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "I've been told by several independent sources..." (re "GPLv2 is not a 'contract' but a 'pure copyright license'"), Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Landley: "Not Going There (tm)" (re 'license' vs 'contract'), Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- SYS-CON: "Think Linus Will Defer to Sun on GPLv3? The Answer May Hinge on a Bottle of Wine", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Landley: "Not Going There (tm)" (re 'license' vs 'contract'), rjack, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Viro: "you are preaching to non-believers", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Viro: "_that_ is a final draft?", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/19
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Williams: "it's time to drop the GPL", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/19
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Harkes: "GPLv3 seems to fall short on actually preventing tivoization", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/19
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "Face it, the 'open source' crowd is the *bigger* crowd",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Viro: "How many GPL spirits can dance on the end of a pin?", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/19
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Comment 3380: Combining propietary and GPL code, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/21
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Rosen: "Comments on GPLv3", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/21
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Comment 3452: This hurts both users and hardware vendors, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Comment 3446: Saving provision, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Brazilian GNUtian Oliva: "how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Viro: "Permission denied", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Oliva: "Two-way cooperation", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Viro: "Do piss off. You know full well what I'm saying.", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Oliva: "additional permissions to combine", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/22