[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
26 May 2007 11:59:19 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On May 26, 4:09 am, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Then what's all this talk about "virality", etc.?
>
> Same reason why people spread FUD.
>
> You seem to be contradicting yourself. At one moment you say that
> one needs to release the combined work under GPL (which by
> definition releases the original part of the program's source code
> under GPL since that is part of the combined work
>
> I have never said that, you are not required to accept the GPL. You
> are free not to accept it. Please refer to the GPL instead of me for
> further questions.
Didn't say I did, I was just asking about how and WHY it applies the
way it does during certain circumstances.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again,
mike3 <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
Re: GNU License, Again, Keith Thompson, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21