[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2007 22:13:26 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> > The original is no longer free, since it depends on a non-free work.
> > The resulting work, a deriviate, is no longer free. And for the last
> > time, the GPL cannot make anything free, only the copyright holder
> > can.
>
> How is the free code suddenly dependent on the non free work?
> The non-free work is what's dependent on the free code, not
> the other way around, in my scenario.
>
> It is a _deriviate_, that is how it is dependant. It doesn't matter
> what depends on what.
Alfred, you have a talent. Now I've got to clean both monitors.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Tyler Smith, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24