Re: GNU License, Again

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
> > [...]
> >>    So then why must it too be free, why must the license require that
> >>    to be free?
> >>
> >> To keep things free, again, this was answered as well before.
> >
> > Man oh man, you're krank. Suppose he takes PUBLIC DOMAIN work and
> > links it with the GPL'd work. Nobody can apply ANY copyright license
> > to work in public domain.
> 
> You are confused.  Licenses apply to particular _copies_, not some

Copyright licenses apply to work, idiot.

regards,
alexander.