[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Bilgehan . Balban |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
23 May 2007 07:51:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On May 15, 9:27 pm, John Hasler <j...@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> Bahadir writes:
> > I don't own the library implementation, but what about any instance of
> > symbols I use in my code?
>
> The symbols themselves are not protected by copyright at all.
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@dhh.gt.org
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI USA
OK, also there is the concept of a "public interface", which does not
seem to be mentioned in the GNU FAQ. For example the linux kernel
headers are a "public interface", such that they are non-copyrightable
and userspace programs can use them and yet can have non-gnu licenses.
This is mentioned in:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/1297
Are those kernel headers explicitly declared as "public interface"
somewhere, or else how do you distinguish a "non-copyrightable public
interface"?
Thanks,
Bahadir
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question,
Bilgehan . Balban <=
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/23