[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 22:52:05 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> That's not the letter of the GPL you are obeying, but some fuzzy
> notion of yours. The problem here is contributory infringement: the
> infringement is _planned_ and _prepared_ by you with the end-assembly
> to be done in a mechanical way by the customer as your agent.
GNU Republic apart, the customers won't infringe copyrights licensed
under the GPL even if they were to bother to create real derivative
works (aggregation aside for a moment). 17 USC 117. And § 69d UrhG
Ausnahmen von den zustimmungsbedürftigen Handlungen.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
Message not availableRe: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22