[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:54:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Mike Cox writes:
> It says there legal action is only possible if all copyright is owned by
> a single entity.
Not true.
> In other places they claim they're doing this because ... Debian ... [is]
> requiring copyright transfer as well...
Not true.
> I have heard first hand that Debian not only does not require it, but
> they don't even have an entity one could assign copyright to even if one
> wanted to.
Copyrights could be assigned to SPI but there is no requirement to do so.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Mike Cox, 2006/10/17
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Michael Black, 2006/10/17
- Installer programs (was: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question), CBFalconer, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, John Hasler, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, David Kastrup, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Robert M. Riches Jr., 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, John Hasler, 2006/10/18
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, David Kastrup, 2006/10/18
- Message not available
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/24