[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:54:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> <URL:http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6366>
>
> You should read his later work as well.
>
> http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf
>
> In plain language:
>
> http://www.stromian.com/Corner/Feb2005.html
Of course "in plain language" is a lie since the author of the latter
piece does a lot of claims that are quite different from what Rosen
states.
And anyway, the more important point of my preceding posting was not
Rosen's interpretation of the copyright language with regard to
derivative works, but the actual text of the law.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17