[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:57:17 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > This is a weird example - distributing source code of a proprietary
> > product in order to compile and link it with GPLed libraries smacks
> > of putting the cart in front of the horse.
>
> It smacks of license circumvention.
Only in your brain-damaged head. 17 USC 117, retard.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Stephen Peters, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17