[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:32:33 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> The unlinked work may be affected, too, if its purpose can't be met
> without linking, and thus the act of linking from the enduser becomes
> a formality instead of an available technical option.
What are you smoking dak?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: More GPL questions, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
Re: More GPL questions, Stephen Peters, 2006/10/16
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17