Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?

[Alexander Terekhov]

kero552@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> Not really. I am looking for reason, why some programs using kernel can
> be not-GPL, while programs using GPL library has to be GPL.

"programs using GPL library has to be GPL" is the GNU law crapola. 
Unless you happen to live in the GNU Republic (i.e in alternative 
universe), don't buy the FSF's illegal crapola. Research the law
on software derivatives, copyright misuse, and antitrust (IP price 
fixing contracting/conspiracy).

regards,
alexander.