[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2? |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Oct 2006 16:54:19 +0200 |
kero552@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> adjusted term "derived work" - the most uncertain of all. It has legal
> meaning, but they changed it.
>
> You cant adjust key term of license and expect it to stay same.
> For derived code look at: US Code title 17, kapitole 1 a ยง101.
He he. Now see kapitole VI (SOFTWARE COMBINATIONS UNDER THE GENERAL
PUBLIC LICENSE) a
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
(And the rest of kapitoles in it too.)
regards,
alexander.
- Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, kero552, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, kero552, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, kero552, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, kero552, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07