Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Please specify which market you think this is supposed to be.  Up to
> >> now you have only vaguely paraded "intellectual property" around.
> >> Please specify _exactly_ what Wallace is supposed to be selling in the
> >> presumed market.
> >
> > Operating system software. I'll make it simple for you. Suppose
> > that all GPL'd software evaporates tomorrow. People will need
> > software in place of it. That's the market.
> 
> So you are talking about selling licenses and media.  Fine.  RedHat is
> operating profitably in that business, so no predatory pricing.  

Red Hat recoups losses from GPL conspiracy (with other co-conspirators
in predatory priced IP that is meant to kill competition) by higher 
prices of their subscription service contracts.

"A plaintiff must prove (1) that the prices complained of are below an 
appropriate measure of its rival's costs and (2) that the competitor 
had a reasonable prospect of recouping its investment in below cost 
prices."

Wallace is a sure winner on the merits as well, AFAICS.

regards,
alexander.