[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 May 2006 10:31:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
I wrote:
> The GPL never requires you to publish your source code to the world.
Byron A Jeff writes:
> That's true in the direct sense. However, there can be a impetus for it
> to occur indirectly because the GPL gives anyone you transfer the code to
> the right not only to modify it, but to distribute it as they see fit.
Yes of course, but the OP seems to suffer from the common delusion that the
GPL requires that you actively publish the code.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Byron A Jeff, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Gordon Burditt, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16