[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL? |
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2006 15:35:44 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Uh, no. Because they communicate through a standardized interface not
> particular to those programs.
Yeah, and since most of Microsoft's interfaces are not "standardized",
folks at samba (customers aside for a moment) and other projects that
rely on interoperation with and interfacing to MS stuff may well end
up in jail for massive copyright infringement. In the GNU Republic,
that is.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, (continued)
Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/13
- Re: Do I have to release the patch for a GPL software under GPL?,
Alexander Terekhov <=