Archives are refreshed every 15 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
gnu-misc-discuss (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
][
gnu-misc-discuss info page
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Wed Mar 29 2006 08:41:06 -0500
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
March 29, 2006
GPLv3 comedy unfolding
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
08:41
March 27, 2006
NYC LOCAL: Wednesday 29 March 2006 NYLUG: Jack Aboutboul on Fedora Core 5
,
secretary
,
13:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
12:44
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alan Mackenzie
,
12:43
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
12:41
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
John Hasler
,
12:41
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kier
,
12:26
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
12:23
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
David Kastrup
,
12:22
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
09:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
02:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
01:40
March 26, 2006
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
,
07:32
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Graham Murray
,
05:41
March 25, 2006
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alfred M. Szmidt
,
17:55
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
17:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alfred M. Szmidt
,
16:32
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Merijn de Weerd
,
13:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alfred M. Szmidt
,
13:22
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
12:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
12:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
11:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alan Mackenzie
,
07:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Merijn de Weerd
,
04:40
March 24, 2006
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
17:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
17:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Merijn de Weerd
,
17:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
17:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Merijn de Weerd
,
16:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
14:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
14:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
14:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
13:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
13:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
13:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
09:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
09:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
08:40
March 23, 2006
NYC LOCAL: Sunday 26 March 2006 New Yorkers for Fair Use Meeting: Call for Participation
,
secretary
,
22:40
March 22, 2006
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
11:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kier
,
11:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Alan Mackenzie
,
09:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
09:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
08:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
07:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
07:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
07:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
David Kastrup
,
04:41
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
04:41
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
David Kastrup
,
04:41
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Alan Mackenzie
,
00:40
March 21, 2006
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Tim Smith
,
21:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Tim Smith
,
21:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
20:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Linønut
,
18:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
karl
,
15:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
,
14:29
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
,
14:23
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
08:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
07:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
07:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Alexander Terekhov
,
06:40
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
David Kastrup
,
05:40
Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
,
04:31
March 20, 2006
NYLXS Journal Meeting This Week
,
spam-killer
,
11:29
March 16, 2006
Re: "Preferred form for making modifications"
,
Per Abrahamsen
,
03:05
March 14, 2006
Re: NYC LOCAL: Tuesday 14 March 2006 Lisp NYC: Matt Knox on nyclisp: An Urban(e) Lisp for the Lazy and Static
,
donnie
,
15:00
March 13, 2006
NYC LOCAL: Tuesday 14 March 2006 Lisp NYC: Matt Knox on nyclisp: An Urban(e) Lisp for the Lazy and Static
,
secretary
,
15:49
FTPS client wanted
,
Angel Tsankov
,
15:49
Re: C/C++ statements and assembly mixed listing
,
Miles Bader
,
15:49
March 10, 2006
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
chrisv
,
17:52
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
17:52
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
JEDIDIAH
,
11:10
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
11:06
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Jamie Hart
,
11:06
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
chrisv
,
08:55
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
chrisv
,
08:50
March 09, 2006
C/C++ statements and assembly mixed listing
,
Allan
,
23:05
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
22:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
22:30
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
18:20
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
18:20
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
chrisv
,
15:05
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
14:35
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
13:35
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
09:35
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
09:30
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Alan Mackenzie
,
05:45
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Bernd Jendrissek
,
03:45
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Mathew P.
,
02:03
March 08, 2006
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
19:05
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
chrisv
,
18:55
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
B Gruff
,
17:10
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
14:05
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
13:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Kelsey Bjarnason
,
10:45
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Ron House
,
02:08
March 07, 2006
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
billwg
,
22:40
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Rick
,
22:30
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
ray
,
21:00
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Peter
,
20:30
Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
,
Karen Hill
,
19:10
March 06, 2006
Re: Too late! Window hasta la vista 5308 is now fully operational.
,
Erik Funkenbusch
,
16:53
Re: Too late! Window hasta la vista 5308 is now fully operational.
,
The Ghost In The Machine
,
16:53
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc